Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 446 (PNJ)

KRISHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/6793/2026 · 2026-02-11

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.11 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(2) SCC 382. Hon'ble The Supreme Court in the case of Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi (Supra)had held that, “As observed by the High Court, merely on the basis of criminal antecedents, the claim of the second respondent cannot be rejected. In other words, it is the duty of the Court to find out the role of the accused in the case in which he has been charged and other circumstances such as possibility of fleeing away from the jurisdiction of the Court etc.” PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.11 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.11 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.