Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44598 (MAD)

Miranda Merwyn Raj v. Reserve Bank of India

WP Crl./939/2026 · 2026-07-02

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 Miranda Merwyn Raj S/o Irudayaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Reserve Bank of India having its Central Office at Mumbai and Regional Office at Fort Glacis, Chennai. 2.The Branch Manager Punjab National Bank No.402, JK Complex, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. 3.The Inspector of Police, CEN Police Station North-East Division, KHB Colony, Gandinagara, Yelahanka, Bangalore – 560 064. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to forthwith de freeze petitioner Saving Bank Account 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 No.9805000400005184 maintained with the 2nd respondent viz., Punjab National Bank, No.402, JK Complex, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054 on any reasonable condition within the time stipulated by this Hon’ble High Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondents : Ms.A.Rexy Josephine Mary for R1 for Mr.C.Mohan for M/s.King and Partridge R2 & R3 – Notice Served NA O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to de freeze petitioner’s Saving Bank Account No.9805000400005184 maintained with the second respondent. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. Though notice served on the respondents 2 and 3 and name printed in cause list, no one appeared either by person or through by pleader. 3.The petitioner is maintaining Saving Bank Account No.9805000400005184 with the second respondent. While being so, at the request made by the third respondent, the second respondent 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 has frozen the petitioner’s account and did not permit the petitioner to operate the account. Immediately, the petitioner enquired with the third respondent and he was informed that he received a sum of Rs.58,000/- from one Dinesh while doing crypto currency transaction, however, nothing was disclosed with the allegation in the FIR registered in Crime No.568 of 2023. Further, the petitioner is not accused in Crime No.568 of 2023. At the request made by the third respondent, the second respondent has freezed the petitioner’s account for the alleged transaction of Rs.58,000/-. 4.In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to mark lien over the petitioner’s account to the tune of Rs.58,000/- and permit the petitioner to operate the account with the remaining amount. 5.The writ petition is disposed of. 02.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri To 1.Reserve Bank of India having its Central Office at Mumbai and Regional Office at Fort Glacis, Chennai. 2.The Branch Manager Punjab National Bank No.402, JK Complex, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. 3.The Inspector of Police, CEN Police Station North-East Division, KHB Colony, Gandinagara, Yelahanka, Bangalore – 560 064. W.P. Crl. No.939 of 2026 02.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis