Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4458 (RAJ)

MAHAR SINGH S/O DHUNARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3666/2020 · 2026-04-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3666/2020 Mahar Singh S/o Dhunaram, R/o Village Bhankri PS Pragpura, Tehsil Paota, Distt. Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Jairam S/o Bhanwar Lal, R/o Bhankri PS Pragpura, Tehsil Paota, Distt. Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanay Choudhary for Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/04/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 346/2020 registered with the Police Station, Pragpura, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 and 120-B IPC. 2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that after thorough investigation, the police has submitted the Final Report (Negative) in the aforesaid FIR on 26.12.2020 and the same has also been submitted before the concerned Court on 30.09.2021, hence under the changed circumstances, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. [2026:RJ-JP:15917] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3666/2020] Stay application and all application (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. 4. A copy of the factual report is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/33