Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026
1. Jaseem Akram
2. Shaul Hameed ..Petitioners Vs The Inspector of Police Hosur Town Police Station. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in Crime No.156 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Krishnagiri District, pending investigation and trial. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Meganathan For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 170 of BNSS, Section 7(1) (a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, in Crime No.156 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that based on secret information, the respondent police found the petitioners threatening members of the public with a knife. Hence, the case was registered.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that they have been in judicial custody since 21.05.2026. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the bail application on the ground that both the petitioners have several previous criminal cases. It is submitted that the first petitioner has six previous cases and the second petitioner has five previous cases, including offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, one of which is under Section 302 of IPC.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. Taking into consideration the criminal antecedents of both the petitioners, including the serious offences registered against them, this Court is of the firm view that if they are enlarged on bail, it would jeopardize the interest https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 of society. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 30-06-2026 NSL To
1. The Inspector of Police Hosur Town Police Station.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 16552 of 2026 30-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis