Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44572 (KAR)

SRI.JAYARAM v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/30874/2026 · 2026-10-05

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010675872026 NC: 2026:KHC:55173 WP No. 30874 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30874 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAYARAM S/O LATE DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT KAMMANAHALLI, GOTTIGERE POST, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMAMURTHY H.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 009. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KARNATAKA TANK CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES, GROUND FLOOR, BEEJABHAVAN, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010675872026 NC: 2026:KHC:55173 WP No. 30874 of 2026 BELLARY ROAD, HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 024. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 12.06.2026 AND 12.06.2026 AS FOUND AT ANNEXURES-A AND B IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY.NO.37/1 MEASURING 1 ACRES 08 GUNTAS OF KAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard Sri. Ramamurthy H.S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Shamanth Naik, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010675872026 NC: 2026:KHC:55173 WP No. 30874 of 2026 learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 to 3 have not considered the representations at Annexures-A and B dated 12.06.2026. 4. In that view of the matter, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to consider the representations at Annexures-A and B dated 12.06.2026, in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25