Vijay Anand v. The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police
CRL OP/17079/2026 · 2026-07-03
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44557 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44557 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.07.2026
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.11358 of 2026 Vijay Anand .. Petitioner
Versus The State, Rep. by Sub-Inspector of Police, PEW – Gobi Police Station, Erode District – 638 452. (Cr.No.171 of 2025) .. Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records of the proceedings in C.C.No.212 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Arunkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records in C.C.No.212 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam.
2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.
3. Upon perusing the Final Report filed, it can be seen that the petitioner was travelling from Mysore to Coimbatore. On the way, when he was intercepted, he was in possession of one bottle of liquor of 700 ml, which he purchased from Karnataka.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the same was taken by the petitioner for personal consumption, the F.I.R was registered.
5. Considering the fact that there is not even any material that is collected and filed along with the Final Report to point out that the same was brought in for sale and that the bottle originated from Karnataka and 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026 considering the fact that the petitioner has no other antecedent, I am of the view that this is a fit case for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.
6. In view thereof, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. The Final Report and all the further proceedings in C.C.No.212 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam, shall stand quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03.07.2026 Neutral Citation : no grs To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam.
2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, PEW – Gobi Police Station, Erode District – 638 452.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.O.P.No.17079 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.11358 of 2026 03.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis