Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4455 (RAJ)

SMT LACHMA DEVI AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLMP/6215/2015 · 2026-04-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13748] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6215/2015 1. Smt. Lachma Devi W/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 73 years, 2. Rajesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 38 years, 3. Radheyshyam S/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 33 years, 4. Ramprasad @ Pappu S/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 43 years, 5. Ramlal S/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 46 years, 6. Toofan S/o Late Shri Ramjeevan, aged about 55 years, (All are residents of VPO Vatika, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor 2. Babulal Yadav S/o Shri Radheyshyam Yadav, aged about 52 years, R/o Gopalpuri, Meenawala, Jaipur pleaded himself as Secretary, Shri Mahaveer Swami Nirman Cooperaive Society ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma,Dy.GA JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/04/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No. 957/2012, registered with the Police Station J.D.A., District Jaipur for the offences punishable under Section 420 & 406 IPC. 2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor has apprised this Court that perusing the factual report received from the SHO, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur South indicates that after investigation, Final Report (Negative) has been submitted which states the case to be false. Counsel submits that the Final [2026:RJ-JP:13748] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6215/2015] Report has already been submitted before the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No. 3, Jaipur Metropolitan-I on 29.04.2023. 3. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. Stay application, all pending application(s), if any shall also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/15