SK. GOLUM MURSHED @ SK. GOLAM MURSHED v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/993/2026 · 2026-03-31
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4455 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4455 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
31/03/2026 D/L – 19 Court No.28 S. Kundu Allowed
C.R.M.(A) 993 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Panskura P.S case no. 184 of 2023 dated 14/03/2023 under sections 135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act read with Amendment Act
2007. In the matter of: Sk. Golum Murshed @ Sk. Golam ...Petitioner. Mr. A.K. Samanta …for the petitioner. Mr. Aniket Mitra …for the WBSEDCL. Ms. Sukanya Bhattacharyya Mr. S. Balial …for the State.
1. Learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the WBSEDCL submit that the petitioner has already deposited 50% of the finally assessed amount before the authorities.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the State.
3. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioner shall
2
surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from date and regularly attend the jurisdictional Court.
5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)