NIKHIL RANJAN PAUL v. SMT. KANIKA RANI DUTTA AND ANR.
FAT/820/1992 · 2026-09-28
Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44545 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44545 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L.49. September 28, 2026. KAUSHIK.
FAT 820 of 1992
Nikhil Ranjan Paul Vs. Smt. Kanika Rani Dutta & Anr.
None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. In view of the non-appearance of the appellant, FAT 820 of 1992 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
(Atarup Banerjee, J.)