Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010582382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3302/2025 Between: 1. M/S SRI SAI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER, D. RAM PRASAD S/O.NARASIMHA MURTHI, AGE- 47 YEARS ,D.NO.2-277,ANJANEYA NAGAR, RAMAYAPETA (V), KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COMMISSIONER ,KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. R 1 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS SUO MOTU AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.02.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO-3302 OF 2025. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt- 30.08.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 11934/2024 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No.1 Sri S Sachidananda Varma ( S S Varma), Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 1 as Sri N VV Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3302 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11934 of 2024, dated 30.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.07.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑