CRM-M-23015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 221 GOPAL STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE Present:- Mr. Abhishek Goel, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-17978-2026 This is an application under Section 528 of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order passed by learned Session Judge Sonepat and annexures along with the petition. The same is allowed as prayed for. MAIN CASE 1. Through the instant petition filed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner 23015-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Abhishek Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 2026 This is an application under Section 528 of Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order passed by learned Session Judge Sonepat and annexures along with the petition. The same is allowed as prayed for. MAIN CASE Through the instant petition filed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23015-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. This is an application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order passed by learned Session Judge Sonepat and The same is allowed as prayed for. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner ….Petitioner ....Respondent ik Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order passed by learned Session Judge Sonepat and under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-23015 seeks anticipatory bail in case Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat 2. On the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat. petit further submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused only on Kartik. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the offence in question and it is a trite law that disclosure statement of the co durin argued that if the contents of the FIR are taken to be true, even then no specific injury has been attributed to the present petitioner and it is the co to t accused has already been granted the concession of bail by the learned trial Court. Further, co been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by a Co ordinate Ben recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating 23015-2026 (O&M) 2 seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya ya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat On 27.04.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused only on the basis of the disclosure statement made by co Kartik. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the offence in question and it is a trite law that disclosure statement of the co during his custodial interrogation is not admissible. He further argued that if the contents of the FIR are taken to be true, even then no specific injury has been attributed to the present petitioner and it is the co-accused Kartik, who inflicted injuries to the complainant. He further submitted that the said co accused has already been granted the concession of bail by the learned trial Court. Further, co- been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by a Co ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.03.2026. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency. FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya ya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat. following order was passed by this Court: - Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the ioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused the basis of the disclosure statement made by co-accused Kartik. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the offence in question and it is a trite law that disclosure statement of the co-accused g his custodial interrogation is not admissible. He further argued that if the contents of the FIR are taken to be true, even then no specific injury has been attributed to the present accused Kartik, who inflicted injuries he complainant. He further submitted that the said co- accused has already been granted the concession of bail by the -accused Ronak Malik has also been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by a Co- ch of this Court, vide order dated 19.03.2026. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.398 dated 14.12.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 61(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, District Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the ioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused accused Kartik. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the offence in question accused g his custodial interrogation is not admissible. He further argued that if the contents of the FIR are taken to be true, even then no specific injury has been attributed to the present accused Kartik, who inflicted injuries - accused has already been granted the concession of bail by the accused Ronak Malik has also - ch of this Court, vide order dated 19.03.2026. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-23015 DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent seeks time to file status report in the matter. investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 3. L the order dated investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions submitted that the petitioner ha required for further investig 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall al Section 482(2) of the BNSS 05.05.2026 Gurpreet 23015-2026 (O&M) 3 Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chinna, Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent seeks time to file status report in the matter. Adjourned to 05.05.2026. In the meantime, the petitioner is di investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 27.04.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner ha investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and required for further investigation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 27.04.2026 passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No On asking of the Court, Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chinna, Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and seeks time to file status report in the matter. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section earned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Sultan, has joined the investigation and is no longer In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the so abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No On asking of the Court, Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chinna, Sr. State and rected to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, he shall be bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section earned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of joined the has no longer In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the so abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.