Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44502 (MAD)

V Anastraj v. Inspector of Police

CRL OP/16819/2026 · 2026-07-02

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 1. V Anastraj S/o. Veerasamy, No.2/129, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Veeramanallur, Villupuram - 604153 ..Petitioner/ Accused Vs Inspector of Police, J3, Guindy Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.Not Known of 2026. ..Respondent/ Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event o her arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Shyam Sunder For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 296 (b), 117(2), 351(2) of BNS in Crime No. Not known of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner. 3. In such circumstances, this Court is of the firm view that the respondent Police may be directed to follow the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2026 INSC 115) and 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1578 and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from today. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry, on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant. 4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 02-07-2026 JRS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet. 2. The Inspector of Police, J3, Guindy Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.Not Known of 2026. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. JRS CRL OP No. 16819 of 2026 02-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis