Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 445 (HP)

SUNITA v. VINAY NANDA

CMP/4220/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sunita & Ors. Vs. Vinay Nanda & Ors. CMPs No. 4220 & 4239/2026 in FAO No. 28/2009 01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajeet Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for non- applicant/respondent No. 3. CMP No. 4220/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicant/appellant No. 3, Ms. Archi, for discharging her natural guardian, as she has attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from matriculation certificate, appended with the application as Annexure P-1, wherein her date of birth has been mentioned as 17.07.2007, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicant/appellant No. 3, Ms. Archi, is ordered to be discharged and she is permitted to pursue the case in her own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 4239/2026 ….2... The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/appellant No. 3, Ms. Archi, for release of the award amount, alongwith up- to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for non- applicant/respondent No. 3, under instructions received from the original counsel, has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court, the same is allowed and the remaining award amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/appellant No. 3, Ms. Archi, as per her share, after proper ….3... verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in para-8 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 1st April, 2026 (raman)