- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436662022 NC: 2026:KHC:54172 WP No. 19146 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 19146 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. T. BASAVARAJAPPA S/O KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KARIGANURU VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHAKRAVARTHY T. S., ADVOCATE AND SRI. HARSHA G., ADVOCATES - ABSENT) AND: 1. DEPUTY REGISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REGISTER UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT 1912, DAVANGERE - 577 005. REP. BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. 2. SECRETARY HALU UTHPADAKARA SAHAKARA SANGHA, REGISTER UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT 1912, R/AT KARIGANURU VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577 219. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT 3. H. MANJAPPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, OIL MILE COMPOUND, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436662022 NC: 2026:KHC:54172 WP No. 19146 of 2022 NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND, HARIHARA - 577 601. 4. B.M. BASAVARAJAPPA SENIOR AUDITOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, DIRECTOR OF AUDITOR OFFICE, DAVANGERE - 577 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1; R2 TO R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 02.07.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed today. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010436662022 NC: 2026:KHC:54172 WP No. 19146 of 2022 The petition is listed today. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition is filed in 2022. Now we are in 2026. The petition is pending for four years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46