Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4449 (PNJ)

VARINDER KUMAR NARULA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/12879/2026 · 2026-04-28

Jagmohan Bansal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12879-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132 Varinder Kumar Narula Union of India & others CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 6. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J 1. The the Constitution of India is seeking direction to of FDs, savings, insurance policies, Post Office deposits, mutual funds etc. to him who is holder of valid registered will of deceased Sheela Kumari. He is also seeking direction to respondents to decide his legal notice dated 06.02.2026. 2. The petitioner is the sole heir of Smt. Sheela Kumari. He is also holder of registered She was unmarried and executed a registered of the petitioner. He Act for grant of succession certificate which is pending adjudication before Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guruharsahai. Relatives of the deceased have got themselves recorded as 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Varinder Kumar Narula Versus Union of India & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Lupil Gupta and Ms. Seema Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 6. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Article the Constitution of India is seeking direction to of FDs, savings, insurance policies, Post Office deposits, mutual funds etc. to him who is holder of valid registered will of deceased Sheela Kumari. He is also seeking direction to respondents to decide his legal notice dated The petitioner is the sole heir of Smt. Sheela Kumari. He is also holder of registered Will of Sheela Kumari who passed away on 29.01.2026. She was unmarried and executed a registered W of the petitioner. He has filed petition under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act for grant of succession certificate which is pending adjudication before Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guruharsahai. Relatives of the deceased have got themselves recorded as IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12879-2026 Date of Decision: 28.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Lupil Gupta and Ms. Seema Sharma, Advocates, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel, petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release amount of FDs, savings, insurance policies, Post Office deposits, mutual funds etc. to him who is holder of valid registered will of deceased Sheela Kumari. He is also seeking direction to respondents to decide his legal notice dated The petitioner is the sole heir of Smt. Sheela Kumari. He is also ill of Sheela Kumari who passed away on 29.01.2026. Will dated 18.06.2021 in favour ection 372 of Indian Succession Act for grant of succession certificate which is pending adjudication before Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guruharsahai. Relatives of nominees in the FDs and other of respondents to release amount of FDs, savings, insurance policies, Post Office deposits, mutual funds etc. to him who is holder of valid registered will of deceased Sheela Kumari. He is also seeking direction to respondents to decide his legal notice dated The petitioner is the sole heir of Smt. Sheela Kumari. He is also ill of Sheela Kumari who passed away on 29.01.2026. ill dated 18.06.2021 in favour ection 372 of Indian Succession Act for grant of succession certificate which is pending adjudication before Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guruharsahai. Relatives of nominees in the FDs and other VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12879-2026 accounts of deceased Sheela Kumari. He has served legal notice dated 06.02.2026 upon the respondents not to release any benefit in name of the nominees but has not been addressed till date. 3. The dispute between the and private. The petitioner has already approached Civil Court seems no reason to in 4. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. 28.04.2026 Vimal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 -2- accounts of deceased Sheela Kumari. He has served legal notice dated 06.02.2026 upon the respondents not to release any benefit in name of the t has not been addressed till date. The dispute between the petitione The petitioner has already approached Civil Court seems no reason to invoke the writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No accounts of deceased Sheela Kumari. He has served legal notice dated 06.02.2026 upon the respondents not to release any benefit in name of the petitioner and respondents is pure civil The petitioner has already approached Civil Court, thus, there voke the writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No accounts of deceased Sheela Kumari. He has served legal notice dated 06.02.2026 upon the respondents not to release any benefit in name of the pure civil , thus, there (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document