Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44488 (KAR)

ARSHIYA TANZEEM v. M K AGRO TECH PVT LTD

MFA/3402/2019 · 2026-10-01

Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010114002019 NC: 2026:KHC:54620 MFA No. 3402 of 2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3402 OF 2019 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. ARSHIYA TANZEEM NOW AGED 32 YEARS, W/O LATE KHURAM PASHA, 2. MOHAMMED ISMAIL NOW AGED 10 YEARS, S/O LATE KHURAM PASHA, 3. B.B.AMEENA NOW AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, S/O LATE KHURAM PASHA, APPELLANT NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN, MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1, ARSHIYA TANZEEM, 4. ASMATHUNNISA NOW AGED 53 YEARS, W/O EJUS PASHA, 5. EJUS PASHA NOW AGED 58 YEARS, BUDOOS SAB, ALL ARE R/O NO.165, 11TH CROSS, SULATHAN ROAD, GOWSIYA NAGAR, C-BLOCK, MYSORE, PIN-570 012. …APPELLANTS (A1, A4, A5-ABSENT) Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010114002019 NC: 2026:KHC:54620 MFA No. 3402 of 2019 2 AND: 1. M.K.AGRO TECH PVT LTD., NO.389, KAVERY LAYOUT, M.B.ROAD, S.R.PATNA TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN-571 430. 2. THE MANAGER, THE SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD, BRANCH OFFICE, GROUND AND 1ST FLOOR RUKMINI TOWERS-3-1, FLATFORM ROAD/RAILWAY APPROACH ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU. PIN-560 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRADEEP.B., ADVOCATE FOR R2; V/O DTD:07.07.2023-NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 21/06/2018, PASSED IN MVC NO.1593/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE D.K. MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT 1. On 11.06.2026, the following order was recorded and on that date, Court notice was issued to the appellants: “Sri.Mallikarjuna Reddy representing Sri.Pradeep.B learned counsel on record for respondent No.2 submits HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010114002019 NC: 2026:KHC:54620 MFA No. 3402 of 2019 3 that Sri.Vishwanatha Poojary.K learned counsel on record for the appellants is no more. In the light of the submissions thus made, issue Court Notice to the appellants directing them to pursue the matter either in person by following the prescribed procedure or through an appointed counsel. List the matter on 30.07.2026.” 2. Subsequently, on 30.07.2026 this Court also adjourned the matter awaiting service of notice to the appellants. 3. The report of the Registry dated 01.08.2026, is that appellants could not be served, as they are not residing at that address. 4. Given the service report and the fact that there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant for the last several dates, this matter cannot be proceeded with any further. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. All pending applications, stand closed. Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA