Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44471 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVAS v. THE STATE BY ACB

CRL.P/4963/2019 · 2026-10-07

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010197622019 NC: 2026:KHC:55891 CRL.P No. 4963 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4963 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE DESEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RESIDING AT NO.16, 4TH CROSS, M.M. ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560026. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE BY ACB, REPRESENTED BY ITS POLICE INSPECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, BANGLAORE CITY POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560001. 2. SRI. MANJUNATH M. S/O MARILINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.19, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560079. (RESPONDENT NO.2 IS DELETED, VIDE ORDER DATED 01.08.2019) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 – DELETED VIDE ORDER DATED 01.08.2019) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010197622019 NC: 2026:KHC:55891 CRL.P No. 4963 of 2019 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE IN SPL.C.C.NO.386/2017 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDING PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU CITY (ANNEXURE-C), IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCENRED INCLUDING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.06.2019 (ANNEXURE-B). THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that challenge was made to the charge-sheet and already the matter is disposed of before the Trial Court convicting the petitioner and an appeal is filed and the same is also heard and reserved. As a result, this petition becomes infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4