Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4447 (JHR)

KIRAN DEVI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./92/2026 · 2026-01-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.92 of 2026 1. Kiran Devi, aged about 40 years, wife of Vinod Gupta, resident of Motipour, Tikait, Ghati Khas, P.O. and P.S. Debaria, District-Devaria, Uttar Pradesh, 274705. 2. Prabhavati Devi, wife of Munilal Saw, aged about 65 years, resident of Bistupur, Near Sabji Market, Bistupur, Dhatkidih, P.O. and P.s. Dhatkidih, District-Seraikella Kharsawan. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. ------ 2/15.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024(S) registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/117(2)109/352/3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Seraikella. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are case and counter case between both the parties and the both the parties are neighbors and the altercation took place with regard to the drain water. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations. He next submits that injury is there, however, now the matter has been settled between the parties and the compromise petition has also been filed before the Learned Session Judge however the learned Session Judge has been pleased to reject the anticipatory bail. He then submits that one co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No. 5393 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the state opposed the prayer and 2026:JHHC:1005 2 submits that the alleged trial is not compoundable. 5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and there are general and omnibus allegation, the joint compromise petition has been filed which was signed by both the sides and the joint compromise petition was filed before the learned Session Judge, which was annexed in ABA No.5393 of 2025 and that fact has come in the order dated 23.9.2025 passed in ABA No. 5393 of 2025, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Seraikella in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024(S), subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 15.01.2026 R.Kumar