Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44466 (CAL)

MABUD SARKAR v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/23033/2026 · 2026-09-25

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.09.2026 Court No.25 D/L No.196 S. Gayen In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 23033 of 2026 Mabud Sarkar Versus The Election Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Anindya Bosw Mr. Golam Mahiuddin Mr. Kaif Hossain …for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the ECI 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has participated in the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor and the interview is schedule to be held in the month of October, 2026 but due to the deletion of the name of the petitioner from the voter list, the authorities are not providing certificates to the petitioner, due to which the petitioner would not be in a position to produce certificates before the authorities at the time of interview. He submits that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority and prays for a direction upon the Appellate Tribunal for disposal of the appeal as early as possible. 2. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 2 4. Urgent certified Photostat copy, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)