Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44464 (KAR)

SMT B PUSHPA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/24957/2022 · 2026-09-30

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010572002022 NC: 2026:KHC:54523 WP No. 24957 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24957 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT B PUSHPA W/O P. BABU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO. 671, PREMA NIVASA GRAPE GARDEN KAMMANAHALLI ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BENGALURU - 560 084. 2. SMT. B. PREMAVATHI D/O P. BABU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.5, SHREE SHAKTHI 4TH CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT 3RD STAGE KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU 560 043. 3. SMT. B. KAVITHA D/O P. BABU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO. 671, PREMA NIVASA GRAPE GARDEN KAMMANAHALLI ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BENGALURU - 560 084. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010572002022 NC: 2026:KHC:54523 WP No. 24957 of 2022 ALL ARE REP BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. P. BABU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE PADMANABHA FLAT NO. 671, PREMA NIVASA GRAPE GARDEN KAMMANAHALLI ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BENGALURU 560 084 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H R ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGLARU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. ZEENATH BEGUM D/O LATE FAHMIDA BEGUM W/O RAJ PASHA MAJOR IN AGE R/AT NO.32/1 MANJUNATH LAYOUT NAGAWARA, BENGALURU - 560 045. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN R.P. NO. 199/2022 BY THE - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010572002022 NC: 2026:KHC:54523 WP No. 24957 of 2022 RESPONDENT NO.1 - DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ON 18.10.2022 AT ANNEXURE P. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are challenging the order passed by respondent No.1 in R.P. No.199/2022 dated 18.10.2022 as per Annexure-P. 2. The petitioners have filed a Memo along with copy of the confirmation deed dated 01.12.2025 wherein the matter has been settled between the petitioners with the private respondents. 3. In that view of the matter, in terms of the Memo dated 03.07.2026, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3