Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4444 (JHR)

SURESH KUMAR AND ORS v. ROAD CONSTRUCTION

WPC/3252/2015 · 2026-01-21

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1676 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3252 of 2015 1. Suresh Kumar, son of late Ramchandra Prasad, resident of VILLAGEAND PO Loma, PS Jandaha, District Vaishali (Bihar). 2. Arbind Pandey, son of Sri Parasnath Pandey, resident of Flat No. B-2, Maharana Apartment, P.P. Compound, P.O. G.p.o., p.s. Chutia, District Ranchi. 3. Jai Prakash Singh son of Shri Raghubir Singh, resident of 3A, Lakshmi Apartment, Argora Talab, Old Argoa Road, P.O. and P.S.s Argora, District- Ranchi-834002. 4. Rajiv Verma son of late Lala Awadhesh Kumar Verma, resident of C-4, Yash Apartment, Patel Nagar, Harmu, PO Harmu, PS Argora, District Ranchi. 5. Siyaranjan Kumar Singh son of late Kritarath Singh, resident of Garima Apartment, Ashok Nagar, PO Ashok Nagar, PS Argora, District Ranchi 6. Prem Kumar Gupta son of late Bindeshwari Prasad Gupta, resident of Garima Apartment, Ashok Nagar, PO Ashok Nagar, PS Argora, District Ranchi. 7. Krishna Kumar Lal son of Dr. M.L. Das, resident of near Birla Hanuman Mandir, Jora Talab Road, Bariatu, P.O. and P.S. Bariatu, District Ranchi. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, H.E.C., P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 3. The Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, H.E.C., P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi. 4.Shri Paras Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted Technical Advisor, Advance Planning, Road Circle, Ranchi, Engineers Building, Kutchery Chowk, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O, P.S. Kotwali District Ranchi 5.Rajdeo Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Daltonganj, P.O. P.S. and District Daltonganj. 6. Brahmanand Pandey son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Central Design Organization, Road 2026:JHHC:1676 2 Construction Department, Bhutal, Inartizan Hostel, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Dumka. 7.Mod Narayan Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Road Anchal, Dumka, P.O., P.S. and District Dumka. 8. Shri Dina Nath Prasad son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Field Survey Division, Advance Planning, Road Construction Department, Dumka, P.O., P.S. and District Dumka. 9. Shri Narendra Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Road Technical Advisor, Road Circle, Construction Department, Ranchi near Ranchi Nagar Nigam, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 10. Shri Satya Narayan Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Technical Advisor, Road Circle, Road Construction Department, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. and District Hazaribagh 11. Shri Hare Ram Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Technical Advisor, Road Circle, Road Construction Department, Chaibasa, P.O., P.S. and District West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. 12. Shri Devniti Roy son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Technical Advisor, Road Construction Department, Engineers Building, Kutchery chowk, Ranchi, P.O G.P.O, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 13. Shri Kapil Deo Prasad son of not known to the petitioner, Assistant Engineer, at present posted as Technical Advisor, office of the Chief Engineer, National Highway, Road Construction Department, Engineers' Hostel No. 2. Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi. 14. Shri Rajendra Kumar Singh son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer in the office of Chief Engineer, National High Way, Engineers Hostel No.2, Dhurwа, P.О. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 15. Shri Braj Kishore Sharma son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, National Highway Flying Squad Cell, Road Construction Department, Engineers’ Hostel No. 2, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi. 16. Shri Akhileshwar Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer , Quality Control Division No.1, Road Construction Department, Ranchi, Quality control Directorate, Din Dayal Nagar, Booty Road, Ranch, P.O. Booty, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. 2026:JHHC:1676 3 17. Shri Arun Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Central Laboratory Division, Road Construction Department, Ranchi, Quality control Directorate, Din Dayal Nagar, Booty Road, Ranch, P.O. Booty, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. 18. Shri Binod Kumar Verema son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Director, Quality control Directorate, Din Dayal Nagar, Booty Road, Ranch, P.O. Booty, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. 19. Shri Chandra Sekhar Prasad son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Flying Squad, Quality control Directorate, Din Dayal Nagar, Booty Road, Ranch, P.O. Booty, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. 20. Sri Amrendra Kumar Singh son known to the petitioner, at present posted as Executive Engineer, Central Design Organization, Road Construction Department, Bhutal, Artizan Hostel, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III -------- Order No. 6 /Dated: 21st January 2026 I.A No. 11333 of 2023 This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioners praying for a direction upon the 2nd Respondent to consider the fresh representations (Annexure-I.A-1 series) made by the petitioners in view of the fact that all the petitioners have now retired. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that now the original prayer of promotion is only for notional basis as such the petitioners have filed separate representation before the 2nd Respondent. As such he submits that the instant interlocutory application may be allowed and the main writ application may be disposed of by directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the individual representation filed by the petitioners and take a decision in their favour. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not raise objection. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case 2026:JHHC:1676 4 and looking to the averments made in this application, I.A No. 11333 of 2023 is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the main writ application is also disposed of by directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the individual representation annexed as Annexure-I.A-1 series made by the respective petitioner in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations. For brevity, the copy of Annexure I.A-1 series i.e. individual representation shall be submitted before the 2nd Respondent at the earliest by any of the petitioners and the moment 2nd Respondent receives the representations, he will take a decision and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. It goes without saying that if any order which would be in favour of the petitioner(s), the consequential benefits shall also be extended to them. 6. W.P.(S) No. 3252 of 2015 stands disposed of. 7. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 21st January 2026 Amit Uploaded on 29/1/2026