Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44435 (KAR)

K.T.SHESHANNA GOWDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/29924/2026 · 2026-09-29

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010649492026 NC: 2026:KHC:54106 WP No. 29924 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 29924 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: K.T.SHESHANNA GOWDA, S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, HANDUR VILLAGE, HONNEKUDGE POST, NARASIMHARAJAPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 134. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 01. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 101, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TARIKERE SUB DIVISION, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010649492026 NC: 2026:KHC:54106 WP No. 29924 of 2026 TARIKERE - 577 228, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NARASIMHARAJAPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 134. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFER SHAH, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO ISSUE SAGUVALI CHIT PURSUANT TO THE GRANT ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE - B ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF 3 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.29 AND 30 SITUATED AT HANDOORU TALUK, VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NARASIMHARAJAPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT IN COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND N AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010649492026 NC: 2026:KHC:54106 WP No. 29924 of 2026 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the prayer No.ii challenging the order dated 19/26.05.2026 passed by respondent No.4 (Annexure-P). 4. Taking into consideration the averments made in the representation dated 09/17.03.2026 (Annexure-M), the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation at Annexure-M, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34