Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44423 (KAR)

MAHIBOOB v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5166/2024 · 2026-10-07

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010265092024 NC: 2026:KHC:56205 CRL.P No. 5166 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5166 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MAHIBOOB, S/O ALI SAB, AGED 25 YEARS, NO.1-12, MADDARKI, SHAHAPUR, YADAGIR, KARNATAKA - 585 287 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. THABITTA R, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH KOTHANUR PS 2. LOPHY VELLARA EBENEZER GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, NO.19, HENNUR, BAGALUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU CITY KARNATAKA - 560 077. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.105/2024 U/S 408 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010265092024 NC: 2026:KHC:56205 CRL.P No. 5166 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call. 2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply the same. Since the petition is of the year 2024, it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4