- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010002492015 NC: 2026:KHC:54535 WP No. 1054 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1054 OF 2015 (L-PW) BETWEEN: K C DAS PRIVATE LIMITED #93, ST MARKS ROAD BANGALORE 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE MR. C R GILBERT. …PETITIONER (K C DAS PRIVATE LIMITED, PARTY IN PERSON) AND: 1. THE SENIOR LABOUR INSPECTOR 41ST CIRCLE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR KARMIKA BHAVAN BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560029. 2. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT DIVISION-4, KARMIKA BHAVAN BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560 029. 3. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE HOTELS AND RESORTS STAFF AND WORKERS UNION Digitally Signed by NARENDRA PRASAD HAREKOPPA THIMMANNA GOWDA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010002492015 NC: 2026:KHC:54535 WP No. 1054 of 2015 #6, SIRUR PARK ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STAT HOTELS AND RESORTS STAFF AND WORKERS UNION #43, MIG 2ND STAGE, KHB COLONY BASAVESHWARA NAGAR BANGALORE-560 079. 5. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LABOUT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. RAJAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R2 & R5: SRI. K.B. NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R3: SRI. VISHNU HEDGE, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 I.E., ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, DIVISION-4, BANGALORE IN PWA/CR/1/2014-15 DATED:27.11.2014 AT ANNEXURE-M TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This Court, by order dated 22.09.2026 permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to retire from the case Digitally Signed by NARENDRA PRASAD HAREKOPPA THIMMANNA GOWDA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010002492015 NC: 2026:KHC:54535 WP No. 1054 of 2015 and directed the office to show the name of the petitioner in the cause-list. 2. Today, when the matter is called neither the petitioner is present nor is any counsel engaged. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 3. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 76 Digitally Signed by NARENDRA PRASAD HAREKOPPA THIMMANNA GOWDA