Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44418 (KAR)

SRI SATISH K G v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14377/2021 · 2026-10-01

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283682021 NC: 2026:KHC:54887 WP No. 14377 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 14377 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SATISH K.G, SON OF LATE K.S. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. SMT. K.S. SHOBHA WIFE OF K.G. SATISH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SMT. V.T. LAKSHMI WIFE OF NITHIN S. KASAL AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT NO.14, MEI COLONY, LAGGERE MAIN, PEENYA 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 058. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJGOPALA NAGARA PS, REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER BENGALURU - 560 086. Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283682021 NC: 2026:KHC:54887 WP No. 14377 of 2021 2. SRI. K.G. RANGANATH S/O. K.S. GOVINDARAJ AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 3. SRI. K.G. PRABHAKAR S/O K.S. GOVINDARAJ AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 4. SRI. K.G. SURENDRA S/O. K.S. GOVINDARAJ AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.14, MEI COLONY, LAGGERE MAIN, PEENYA 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF THE CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT NO.8559/2019 DTD. 9.7.2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283682021 NC: 2026:KHC:54887 WP No. 14377 of 2021 ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioners. 2. No steps were taken for issue of notice vide Court Orders dated 11.09.2026 and 16.09.2026 and earlier Order dated 23.08.2021. 3. However, in the interest of justice, this Court imposed cost of Rs.500/- and granted one more opportunity for the petitioners to pay the process fee. But despite such indulgence shown by this Court, cost not paid nor the process be paid. 4. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5