IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91181 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Kadir @ Md. Qadir @ Firoj Son of Late Md. Gaffar @ Gaffar Miyan Resident of Village - Jagta Palar Tola, P.S.- Raniganj, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the State : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 169 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution story, on 24.10.2024, two unknown persons on a blue Apache motorcycle intercepted the informant and his colleague at gunpoint near Bhanghi Tola. The assailants looted Rs. 1,68,873/- and other valuables and fled away. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He is not named Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91181 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 in the FIR and other co-accused persons have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 55583 of 2025. The petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2025. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Witnesses, in paragraph 11 and 15 of the case diary, have fully supported the prosecution case and the petitioner has strong criminal antecedent. 7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, presently, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is rejected. 8. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T