Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44369 (CAL)

GHANSHYAM DAS AGARWAL v. SUMITRA DEBI VARMA

CO/3319/2026 · 2026-09-29

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 48. sg 29-09-2026 Ct. 6 CO 3319 of 2026 Ghanshyam Das Agarwal Versus Sumitra Debi Verma [ Mr. Koushik Pradhan …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court at Sealdah, to dispose of the Ejectment Suit No. 99 of 2005, expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit is at the peremptory hearing stage. From the order sheets appended to this application, this Court finds that the regular Presiding Officer is not available. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite party. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, this civil revision application stands disposed of with a direction that after the regular Presiding Officer joins the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court at Sealdah, shall make an endeavour to dispose of the Ejectment Suit NO. 99 of 2005 keeping in mind that the suit pending from the year 2005. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if 2 applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)