- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286052024 NC: 2026:KHC:54459 CRL.P No. 4852 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4852 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MOHAMMED SABIH IQBAL AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O TAHIR IQBAL R/AT NEW NO.56 & OLD NO.80 MOSQUE ROAD, FRASER TOWN BENGALURU-560005 2. TAHIR IQBAL AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O MOHAMMED ISHFAQ BANDAY R/AT NO 603, 5TH CROSS 8THMAIN, 1ST STAGE, H B.R LAYOUT KALYAN NAGAR, HORAMAVU BENGALURU-560 043 3. ZAINAB UZMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O TAHIR IQBAL R/AT NO 603, 5TH CROSS 8THMAIN, 1ST STAGE H.B.R LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR HORAMAVU, BENGALURU-560 043 4. TABIA TAMIM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS W/O SYED AKMAL GHOUSE R/AT NO 18/1, 456, 2ND CROSS M.M LAYOUT, KAVAL BYRASANDRA R.T NAGAR BENGALURU-560032 Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286052024 NC: 2026:KHC:54459 CRL.P No. 4852 of 2024 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BALASUBRAMANYA B.N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TUMAKURU WOMEN POLICE STATION BENGALURU, REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU-560 001 2. SAMIYA HIBA AFTAB AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS W/O MOHAMMED SABIT IQBAL R/O MEHER MANSION 8TH CROSS, KRISHNA NAGARA TUMAKURU TOWN TUMAKURU-572 103 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLIANT IN CR.NO.76/2024 REGISTERED BY THE TUMAKURU WOMEN POLICE /Ist RESPONDENT POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 498- A,323,307,114,504,506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF DP ACT, NOW THE CASE IS PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT TUMAKURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286052024 NC: 2026:KHC:54459 CRL.P No. 4852 of 2024 2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, there is no compliance of the same. As the petition is of the year 2024, it seems that neither the petitioners nor the counsel for the petitioners is interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4