[2026:RJ-JP:11724] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 396/2026 1. Divya Saini D/o Nathu Ram Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Lodha Ki Dhani, Nindar, Harmada, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Manohar Bunkar S/o Dhanna Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mothu Ka Bas, Chetawala, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur. 4. The SHO, Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur. 5. The SHO, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur. 6. Nathuram Saini S/o Babulal Saini, 7. Banwari Lal Saini S/o Babulal Saini, 8. Mahesh Saini S/o Babulal Saini, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv., with Ms. Vijay Laxmi Jangid, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.6 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:11724] (2 of 2) [CRLW-396/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Babu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 10.03.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.6 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5 - Station House Officer, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) and respondent No.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/203