On 23.01.2026, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that the name of the petitioners surfaced in the FIR based on the supplementary statement of the 11.12.2025, while the FIR was registered on Neither any over act nor any injury has been attributed to them. Similarly circumstanced co Malkiat Singh, Deepak Sandhu, Teja Singh, Beant Singh and Balwinder Singh, have already been anticipatory bail by this 09.01.2026 and 19.01.2026. The petitioners are ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will Notice of motion. , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that the name of the surfaced in the FIR based on the supplementary statement of the complainant given on 11.12.2025, while the FIR was registered on 28.11.2025. Neither any over act nor any injury has been attributed to Similarly circumstanced co-accused, namely, Sandhu, Teja Singh, Beant Singh and Balwinder Singh, have already been granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated and 19.01.2026. The petitioners are ready and investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.18 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to join the investigation on or before 27.01.2026. In the event of their arrest, they shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482 (2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioners do not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 02.02.2026. To be heard alongwith CRM-M-207-2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from the Investigating Officer affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 23.01.2026 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.18 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.