M/S HURSOOKDAS BALKISSENDAS v. DULAL LAL SEAL & ORS
FAT/3419/1991 · 2026-09-28
Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44349 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44349 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L.39. September 28, 2026. KAUSHIK.
FAT 3419 of 1991
M/s. Hursookdas Balkissendas Vs. Dulal Lal Seal & Ors.
None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. It appears from the records that the defects pointed out by the Department as far back as in 21 September, 1992 have not been cured. In view of the above, FAT 3419 of 1991 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
(Atarup Banerjee, J.)