Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010595712024 NC: 2026:KHC:55350 CRL.P No. 11482 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11482 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1.
RR INFOCOM 27/668, LAKSHMI PRABHA LIG-571, 11TH CROSS ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR COCHIN-682 032 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. RENU J NAIR
ALSO AT RR INFOCOM 61/3564, INTUC ROAD, NEAR SOUTH OVER BRIDGE, RAVIPURAM, VALANJAMBALAM, COCHIN 682016 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.RENU J NAIR
2.
RENU J NAIR MANAGING PARTNER RR INFOCOM MATHER SHREENE ORCHARD TOWER 2 5D, VIDYA NAGAR ROAD, VIDYA NAGAR, COCHIN 682020
Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010595712024 NC: 2026:KHC:55350 CRL.P No. 11482 of 2024
3.
MRINALI KUMAR MATHER SHREENE ORCHARD TOWER 25D, VIDYA NAGAR ROAD, VIDYA NAGAR, COCHIN-682020 …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANINDITA CHAKRABORTHY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
INFLOW TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
"INFLOW HOUSE" NO.33 AND 34 INDIRANAGAR, 1ST STAGE, OFF 100 FEET ROAD BANGALORE-560 038 REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD-CREDIT SERVICES AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY.
MR.E.C. PRAVEEN REDDY PH NO. 888445966 EMAIL ID: praveen.r@inflowtechnologies.com
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS)
PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED 03.02.2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY THE ENTIRE PROCEEDING FILED IN THE COURT OF THE 36TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS, IN CC NO.9585/2023 AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 36TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE. (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010595712024 NC: 2026:KHC:55350 CRL.P No. 11482 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12