Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4430 (CHH)

ASHWINI NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3156/2026 · 2026-04-09

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16577 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3156 of 2026 1 - Ashwini Nirmalkar W/o Neetraj Nirmalkar Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Tulsipur, Sadhuchal Ward No. 18, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. M.R.A. 1375, Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahandi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director General Of Police Police Headquarters (Phq), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent Distt. Hospital, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Amitesh Yadav, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Sahil Singh, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 10/04 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to immediately release the sanctioned amount of Rs. 1,17,800/- with interest. SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief deemed fit in the interest of justice. ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Constable. He incurred expenditure for his treatment and thereafter, has submitted the bills for reimbursement before the concerned authority which till date is pending consideration and therefore, direction be issued to the concerned authority to consider and take decision on the medical claim of petitioner and reimburse the amount as per his entitlement at the earliest within specified time frame. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State would submit that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the medical claim of the petitioner, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. If the claim of the petitioner is still pending consideration, it will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the concerned respondent to consider and take decision on the medical reimbursement application submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of order and to reimburse the amount for which the petitioner is entitled. It is ordered accordingly. 3 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey