- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010679212026 NC: 2026:KHC:55171 WP No. 30951 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30951 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT VYASARAJAPURA VILLAGE, SOSALE HOBLI, T. NARSIPURA TALUK, VYASARAJAPURA, MYSURU - 571120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUSUDHAN J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 020. 2. THE TASHILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH, KG ROAD, NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SAMPAGI RAM NAGARA Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010679212026 NC: 2026:KHC:55171 WP No. 30951 of 2026 BENGALURU- 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO RESTORE ENTRIES IN THE PAHANI IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard Sri. Madhusudhan J., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010679212026 NC: 2026:KHC:55171 WP No. 30951 of 2026 representations dated 25.07.2024 and 10.07.2026 at Annexures-A and B respectively. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is evident that the name of the petitioner has not been reflected in the revenue records for more than 29 years. In the circumstances, respondent No.2 cannot, at this stage, be directed to consider the representations. 5. However, it is open to the petitioner to establish her right over the property in question in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26