Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44299 (CAL)

SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE v. SUNIL KUMAR AGARWAL AND ORS

MAT/674/2026 · 2026-09-30

Arjun Ray Mukherjee, Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.08.2026 Item No. 04 Court No.12 Sandip MAT 674 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 CAN 3 of 2026 Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Sunil Kumar Agarwal & Ors. Mr. Shaunak Ghosh ….for the appellant. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the appellant is taken on record. 2. In spite of service none appears on behalf of the respondents. 3. CAN 3 of 2026 is an application for restoration of the MAT 674 of 2026, which was dismissed for default on May 05, 2026. 4. Considering the averments in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said application, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from attending the Court when the matter was taken up and thereafter dismissed. 5. The restoration application is allowed. 6. MAT 674 of 2026 along with the connected application are restored to its original file and number. 7. Let the matter appear in the Combined Monthly List of September 2026. 8. Notice be given to all the non-appearing respondents and/or their learned advocate along with the copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.) 2