Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44290 (CAL)

MIZANUR RAHAMAN v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/21731/2026 · 2026-09-28

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 188 28.09.2026 Court. No. 25 sourav WPA 21731 of 2026 Mizanur Rahaman Vs. The Election Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Asif Reja Ansary … for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey … for E.C.I. Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee Ms. Sneha Chatterjee … for the State. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got his job at Czech Republic and, as such, the petitioner is not in a position to appear before the Appellate Tribunal in person if the appeal is taken up of hearing and he prays for liberty to appear before the Appellate Tribunal through Virtual Mode at the time of hearing of the appeal. 2. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal at the time of hearing of the appeal through Virtual Mode and to dispose of the appeal as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 3. WPA 21731 of 2026 is disposed of. 4. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)