- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010243562019 NC: 2026:KHC:56638 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4504 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHYAM S/O SHANSHIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO.17, KRISHNA REDDY BUILDING, CHANDAPURA, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106. 2. SRI. SOLEMAN S/O THOMAS PERIAN, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS GPR LAYOUT, HALE CHANDAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106. 3. SRI. RAHUL S/O NIRMALAN, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS KRISHNA REDDY BUILDING, NEAR THATHAIAHKACHANAYAKANAHALLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106. 4. SRI. VISHNU S/O AYAPPAN AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010243562019 NC: 2026:KHC:56638 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2019 KRISHNA REDDY BUILDING, NEAR THATHAIAHKACHANAYAKANAHALLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH S. ARBATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SURYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALURU-560001. 2. SRI. SREEJITH S/O DHAMODHARAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS PADMASHRI BUILDING, NEAR INDIAN PETROL BUNK, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE-562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INCLUDING THE FIR DATED 12.10.2016, CHARGE SHEET DATED 20.07.2017 AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS FILED IN CR.NO.162/2016 REGISTERED AS C.C.NO.396/2018 BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE JMFC AT ANEKAL, BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RELATION TO THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010243562019 NC: 2026:KHC:56638 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 made an observation none appear for the petitioners either physically or through Video Conference. No reasons are forthcoming for non- appearance of the petitioners. Inspite of granting sufficient time, the petitioners have not taken steps to ensure service of notice upon respondent No.2. Since the interim order granted on 29.08.2019 has been lapsed long back, the Registry to intimate the same to the Trial Court where the matter is said to be pending, immediately. Inspite of the same, the petitioners are not pursuing the matter diligently. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8