Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44254 (CAL)

SAMAR PANJA ALIAS SAMAR KUMAR PANJA AND ANOTHER v. GOUTAM KUMAR BARMAN, PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM AND OTHERS

CO/3467/2026 · 2026-09-30

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 50 30.09.2026 Ct. No. 6 SG CO 3467 of 2026 Samar Panja alias Samar Kumar Panja and another vs. Goutam Kumar Barman and others No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation is sought. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of the plaintiffs praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 3rd Court at Howrah to dispose of the injunction application filed in Title Suit No.123 of 2026. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to issue notice upon the opposite parties. However, learned advocate on record shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocates representing them before the learned Trial Judge forthwith. CO 3467 of 2026 stands disposed of by requesting the Civil Judge, Senior Divison, 3rd Court at Howrah to take up hearing of the injunction application filed in Title Suit No.123 of 2026 on the next date fixed and to make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. 2 There shall be, however, no order as to costs. Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)