Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010198352025 2026:GAU-AS:5024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5246/2025 TARUN CH. BAISHYA S/O- THANESWAR BAISHYA, R/O- BHEBARGHAT BANIAPARA, MANGALDOI, P.O. AND P.S. MANGALDOI, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN- 784125. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE COMMISSIONERATE M.G. ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GUWAHATI-7 ASSAM 4:THE MOTOR TRANSPORT OFFICER POLICE RESERVE ASSAM POLICE COMMISSIONERATE M.G. ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 5:ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAMRUP METRO DISTRICT GUWAHATI-1 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A DEKA, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 06.04.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. Deka, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the respondent authorities. 2. The petitioner herein, who is the owner of the three vehicles bearing Registration Nos. AS-13 F-8217, AS-13 P-9396 and AS-01-FY-6728, is aggrieved by the non-payment of an amount of Rs. 20,00,091/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Ninety-One) only, which the respondents are liable to pay to the petitioner on account of requisition of his three vehicles. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that in spite of, submission of several representations, the respondent authorities have not responded to the aforesaid representations. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition. An affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by the respondent No. 2, in the instant case, wherein, at paragraph 6(i), the respondent authorities have admitted to an amount of Rs. 19,32,118/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Thirty-Two Thousand One Hundred Eighteen) only Page No.# 3/3 payable to the petitioner. The respondent authorities have provided a detailed calculation for arriving at the aforesaid amount of Rs. 19,32,118/-(Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Thirty-Two Thousand One Hundred Eighteen) only. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is agreeable to the amount so calculated by the respondent authorities and submits that the instant writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to pay the aforesaid amount within a specified time period. 5. In view of the aforesaid admission of amount of Rs. 19, 32,118/-(Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Thirty-Two Thousand One Hundred Eighteen) only, which is agreeable to the petitioner, this court is of the opinion that the instant case can be disposed of with a direction to pay the said amount. 6. In view of the above, it is directed that the petitioner shall submit a representation along with the instant order before the respondent authorities, i.e., respondent No.2 & 3, at the earliest and on receipt of such representation along with the copy of the instant order, the respondent authorities, i.e., respondent Nos. 2 & 3, shall clear the amount due, as stated above, within a period of two months thereafter. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant