Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44236 (CAL)

NURUDDIN MOLLA ALIAS NOORUDDIN MOLLA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/10093/2023 · 2026-09-30

Aniruddha Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.09.2026 In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Sl. No. 17 Appellate Side Moumita (Assigned) WPA 10093 of 2023 Nuruddin Molla @ Nooruddin Molla Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Md. Shamim Halder, Adv. …… for the Petitioner Mr. Sahasrangsu Bhattacharya, Ld. AGP. Mr. Madhu Jana, Ld. JGA. Mr. Rahul Agarwala, Adv. …For the State Mr. Robiul Islam, Adv. Mr. Sk. Jayed Hossain, Adv. Mr. Sumitra Das, Adv. …For the Private Respondent no. 10 Affidavit-of-service, filed in Court today, is taken on record. Md. Shamim Halder, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. Sumitra Das, learned Advocate appears for private respondent no. 10. Mr. Rahul Agarwala, learned Advocate appears for the State. The parties jointly submit that the orders of this Court dated November 7, 2024 and July 17, 2026 have been complied. Mr. Sk. Jayed Hossain, learned Advocate appearing for the private respondent no. 10 submits that the unauthorized construction has been demolished. 2 Mr. Sahasrangsu Bhattacharya, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State has also confirmed that the unauthorized construction has been demolished. In view of the above, nothing further survives in this writ petition. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved in any manner he shall be at liberty to take steps in accordance with law. Accordingly, WPA 10093 of 2023 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)