Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44221 (CAL)

ROGINA BEGAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25003/2026 · 2026-09-29

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 17 Court No. 05 (DL) (Suvendu Mukherjee) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (APPELLATE SIDE) WPA 25003 of 2026 Rogina Begam –Versus – The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sk. Toslim Ali ….for the petitioner Mr. Debopriya Gupta Ms. Sudipa Bhattacharya …for the State respondents 1) Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2) On behalf of State respondents communication dated 25th September, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Amta Police Station, Howrah is filed and same is taken on record. Copy of same is made over to learned advocate representing petitioner. 3) Based on complaint dated 15th September, 2026 lodged by petitioner concerned authority of Amta Police Station registered a case being Amta Police Station Case No. 192 of 2026 dated 15th September, 2026 under certain provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 against respondent nos. 6 to 8. It is submitted on behalf of State respondents that after registering FIR statement of victim lady was recorded under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and medico-legal examination was 2 conducted. Statement under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 of victim lady was also recorded by learned judicial Magistrate, Amta, Howrah. Case records were transferred to learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur for passing necessary direction upon Officer-in-Charge, Panskura Police Station, Purba Medinipur for effective investigation. 4) However, it is not disclosed in communication dated 25th September, 2026 filed on behalf of State respondents that steps have been taken to apprehend accused persons. 5) Concerned police authorities are directed to take necessary steps for taking the investigation to its logical conclusion by submitting report before jurisdictional Magistrate. 6) Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach jurisdictional Magistrate in the event it is found that police authorities are not taking effective steps while investigating aforesaid case. 7) Writ petition stands disposed of. 8) Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)