SARFARAZ MANSOORI S/O SHRI MOHAMMAD SALIM MANSOORI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5141/2026 · 2026-04-17
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4419 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4419 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16218] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5141/2026 Sarfaraz Mansoori S/o Shri Mohammad Salim Mansoori, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 7-B, Madhuvan 4-A, Senti, Police Station Sadar, District Chittorgarh, (Raj.) (Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitesh Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 17/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 72/2026 registered at Police Station Nanta, District Kota City, for the offence(s) under Section 305(a) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since March, 2026 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and co-accused Pooja Sharma has been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court itself vide order dated 27.03.2026 and conclusion of trial may take long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore,
[2026:RJ-JP:16218] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5141/2026] prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since March, 2026; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; co-accused Pooja Sharma has been enlarged on bail by Trial Court itself vide
order dated 27.03.2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sarfaraz Mansoori S/o Shri Mohammad Salim Mansoori is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/49