Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44182 (KAR)

SRI A L RAMAKRISHNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/35216/2025 · 2026-09-30

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 35216 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. A.L. RAMAKRISHNA SON OF THE LATE A.V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) RETIRED SENIOR GRADE LECTURER, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, K.V.T. POLYTECHNIC, CVV CAMPUS., CHICKABALAPUR - 562 101 RESIDING AT NO.955, 3RD MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO EDUCATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COLLEGIATE AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE PRINCIPAL K.V.T. POLYTECHNIC, CVV CAMPUS., CHICKABALAPUR - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 R4 IS SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I). ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING ACT-7/2014, THE KARNATAKA PRIVATE AIDED EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS EMPLOYEES (REGULATION OF PAY, PENSION AND OTHER BENEFITS) ACT, 2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-C ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 3. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 2. The petitioner, who is working under respondent No.4- Institution, has filed the present petition seeking for quashing of the Act No.7/2014, Karnataka Private Aided Educational Institutions Employees (Regulation of Pay, Pension and other Benefits) Act, 2014 at Annexure-C. The petitioner also sought for extension of benefits as observed and to grant benefits in terms of the observations made in W.P.No.21216/2014 as well as observations made in W.A.No.2476/2015 and connected matters. In terms of the representation at Annexure-C, the petitioner has asserted that he is entitled for certain benefits and observations made in W.A.No.2467/2015 and connected matters. 3. At the time of consideration of the matter, reliance is placed on the order passed in W.A.No.2476/2015 and connected matters dated 24.07.2026. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 4. A perusal of the said order would reveal that writ petitions assailing the constitutional validity of the Act in question was allowed and W.P.No.21216/2014 and connected matters came to be allowed. The same was challenged in W.A.No.2476/2015 and connected matters. 5. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that while the order in writ petition was affirmed, however the nature of relief that flows to the petitioners is on the basis of the observations made in para 61 of the order in appeal. Taking note of the same and on perusal of para 61, the present petition could be disposed of. 6. Para 61 of the judgment reads as follows: "61. It is also necessary to clarify the extent of the relief that would flow from the present judgment. The issue involved in the present batch of matters is confined to whether the service rendered by employees during the non-grant period is liable to be reckoned for the purpose of fixation of pay and other consequential service - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 benefits. Neither the provisions governing grant- in-aid nor the statutory framework casts any liability upon the State to pay salary for the period prior to admission of the post to grant-in- aid. As produced supra, Annexure-I of Rules, 1999 would make it abundantly clear that the management shall be liable for payment of salary and other benefits till the date such posts are admitted into grant-in-aid. The liability to pay salary during the non-grant period continues to rest upon the management of the concerned institution. Consequently, the service rendered during the said period shall be taken into account only for the purpose of notional fixation of pay as on the date of admission of the post to grant-in- aid and for extending consequential benefits such as pension and other service benefits. The employees shall not be entitled to claim arrears of salary or any other monetary benefits from the State for the period preceding the admission of the post to grant-in-aid." Taking note of the above, entitlement of the petitioners would be as observed by the court in the observations contained in para 61. - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010760852025 NC: 2026:KHC:55023 WP No. 35216 of 2025 7. Accordingly petition is allowed. Respondents No.1 to 3 are directed to take note of the observations made above and reckon services of the petitioners from the date of appointment i.e. appointment pre grant in aid for the purpose of extending benefits as would flow from para 61 of the order in writ appeal mentioned above. 8. Needless to state, the respondents to complete consideration and pass appropriate orders within a period of six months. 9. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SKS