SRI TABA MANGHA @ TABA YANGA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Crl.Pet./499/2026 · 2026-04-05
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4418 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4418 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010065532026
2026:GAU-AS:4992
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./499/2026 SRI TABA MANGHA @ TABA YANGA S/O. LT. TABA TAGO OF VILL MENGIO, KULLUNG, P.S SAGALEE DIST- PAPUMPARE ARUNACHAL PRADESH PIN -791119. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SEKHAR, MR. K BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 06.04.2026
1. Heard Mr. R. Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in respect of PRC Case No.1244/2018 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati.
3. On 03.10.2018, learned Trial Court took cognizance of the offence under Section 380 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code against the present petitioner, Taba
Page No.# 2/2 Mangha @ Taba Yanya, at that time the petitioner was in custody.
4. On 05.10.2018, the petitioner was released on bail. On the subsequent date, i.e., on 10.10.2018, the petitioner was absent without steps before the Trial Court and, therefore, the Trial Court directed issue of NBWA against the present petitioner.
5. The petitioner expressed his ignorance about the date on which the case was posted. The petitioner submits that he is interested in facing the trial.
6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides.
7. Since, the petitioner is interested in facing the trial, he should be given adequate opportunity to that effect.
8. I have found that the grounds shown by the petitioner are satisfactory. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.
9. The warrant of arrest issued against the present petitioner shall be recalled.
10. The petitioner, Taba Mangha @ Taba Yanya shall be allowed to remain on previous bail.
11. With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant