Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44168 (CAL)

PRASANTA MONDAL v. RINA DAS PRADHAN BILKANDA-1 GRAM PANCHAYAT

CPAN/1329/2025 · 2026-09-24

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.09.2026 Sl. No.25(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 1329 of 2025 in WPA 3883 of 2025 Prasanta Mondal Versus Rina Das, The Pradhan, Bilkanda-1 Gram Panchayat, North 24-Parganas Mr. Prantick Ghosh, Mr. Prasad Bhattacharyya, Ms. Paulumi Saha …for the Petitioner. Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee, Mr. Anjan Chakraborty, Ms. Sneha Chatterjee, Ms. Avantika Chakraborty …for the Alleged Contemnor. 1. Affidavit-of-compliance filed on behalf of the alleged contemnor is taken on record. 2. Learned Advocate representing the alleged contemnor submits that upon field verification it was found that the construction undertaken by the private respondent is unauthorized and illegal. The matter has also been informed the Sub-Divisional Officer, Barrackpore Sub-Division as well as Block Development Officer, BKP-II Development Block for further course of action under Section 23 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act. 3. Learned Advocate for the applicant-petitioner concedes to such submissions. 4. In view of above compliance, the contempt application being CPAN 1329 of 2025 stands disposed of. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)