Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44129 (CAL)

SARIFUL MONDAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/28034/2025 · 2026-09-28

Rishad Medora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18. 28.09.2026 Court No.22 (Tanmoy) CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/28034/2025 SARIFUL MONDAL VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. B.K. Singh Mr. Jayanta Singh …for the respondent/UOI. Mr. Madhu Jana, Jr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Vinayak Chaubey …for the State. Mr. Debobrata Das Mr. A. Sarkar Mr. Protik Acharjee …for R.B.I. 1. The Union of India, the State of West Bengal and the Reserve Bank of India are represented today. Once again, the petitioner is not represented. 2. This is the fourth occasion, when the matter has been called on for hearing and the petitioner has not been represented. 3. On the last date of hearing, i.e., September 23, 2026, it had been indicated by this Court that one final opportunity would be given to the petitioner to be present and/or be represented or else consequential and/or necessary orders would follow. 2 4. In view of the absence of the petitioner today, the writ petition, being WPA/28034/2025, is dismissed for default. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (RISHAD MEDORA, J.)