Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44127 (CAL)

AFSAR HOSSAIN MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23283/2026 · 2026-09-29

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

7 2299..0099..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 23283 of 2026 Afsar Hossain Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sk. Md. Galib Mr. Abu Siddique Mallik …for the petitioner Mr. D.N. Roy Mr. B.K. Singh Mr. Guddu Singh Mr. Sourav Halder Ms. Diya Chakraborty …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner alleges overt action on the part of concerned police authorities and it is submitted that all of a sudden police authority barged into the house of petitioner and harassed family members of petitioner. Petitioner prays for direction upon the concerned police authorities for restraining them in taking steps in such obnoxious manner. 3. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed two communications dated 1st September, 2026 and 31st August, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Domjur Police Station and Officer-in-Charge, Sankrail Police Station and same are taken on record. Copies 2 of those communications are made over to learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in those communications that based on certain inputs concerned authority of Domjur Police Station made preliminary enquiry but it was found that petitioner shifted to house which comes under jurisdiction of Sankrail Police Station. Subsequently, issue was transferred to Sankrail Police Station for making preliminary enquiry. 5. On perusal of communication dated 31st August, 2026 filed on behalf of Sankrail Police Station it appears that there is denial of allegations made by petitioner concerning incidents occurred at night on 6th July, 2026 and 7th July, 2026. 6. Be that as it may, concerned police authorities shall be at liberty to conduct preliminary enquiry based on information received against petitioner but steps shall be taken in accordance with law and following norms. 7. With the aforesaid clarification writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)