Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4412 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR S/O BEERBALRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15662/2025 · 2026-03-13

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15662/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Beerbalram, Aged 24 Years, R/o Dhani Chechi, Tan Dorata Kalota, Police Station Babai, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At present in District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Naina Saraf Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 120/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 109(1) and 118(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that accused- petitioner is behind the bars since 15.09.2025 and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays [2026:RJ-JP:10606] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15662/2025] that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner hereinabove and further submits that the injuries sustained are grievous in nature as well as dangerous to life. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the complainant, the multiple injuries sustained by the injured person-Sanjay Kumar including a grievous injury caused on frontal region, which is a vital part of the body, with a sharp-edged weapon and which has been opined as dangerous to life; An Axe(Kulhari) has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner and considering that material witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, at this stage, this Court does not deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application is dismissed. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR /13