Sujata Kujur v. Land Reforms And Revenue Department
WPC/3020/2016 · 2026-01-30
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4412 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4412 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2553 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 3020 of 2016
--------- Sujata Kujur, W/o Sanjay Kumar Khalkho, Resident of :- Kokar Chuna Bhatta, Near Distillery, Old H.B. Road, P.O.:-G.P.O. and P.S.:-Sadar, Distt:-Ranchi, State:-Jharkhand and presently posted as Block Development Officer at Kamdara Block, P.O. and P.S.:- Kamdara, District:-Gumla, Jharkhand.
......Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms having office at Project Building, P.O.:-Dhurwa, P.S.:- Jagannathpur, District:-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. and District:-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
4. The Additional Collector, P.O. & P.S. and District:-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
5. The Deputy Collector Land Revenue, P.O. & P.S. and District:- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
.....Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyam, A.C. to S.C.-IV, Advocate
--------- 08/Dated:-30.01.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the last three lines of the letter dated 16.05.2016 (Annexure-2) to the supplementary affidavit wherein the 3rd respondent has issued a direction to the Circle Officer, Keredari, Hazaribagh to initiate a charge sheet against the then Circle Officer (petitioner herein) and report about the institution of the same.
3.
No counter affidavit has been filed in this case.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he is also having no instruction about any development pursuant
2026:JHHC:2553 2 to this letter.
5.
Accordingly, the instant writ application stands
disposed of without any direction with the liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance, if any, by keeping the question of law raised in this writ application to remain open.
6.
Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) JANUARY 30, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 06.02.2026