Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4409 (AP)

POLINA SUBBARAO & ANOTHER v. POLLINA SATYANARAYANA & 2 OTHERS

CRP/4827/2017 · 2026-07-01

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010545972017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4827/2017 Between: 1. POLINA SUBBARAO & ANOTHER, S/O NAGABUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.2-22/1/28/A/303, ARUNA APARTMENTS, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, R.R.DISTRICT. 2. POLINA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O NAGABUSHANAM, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-94, MULAKALLANKA, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST QODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. POLLINA SATYANARAYANA 2 OTHERS, S/O NAGABUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-54/1, MULAKALLANKA, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. POLINA SURIBABU SURYARAO, S/O NAGABUSBANAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-54/1, MULAKALLANKA, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. POLINA RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O NAGABUSHANAM, AGED 54 YEARS, D.NO.3-94, MULAKALLANKA, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ( RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THIS CRP) 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records relating to the EP No.318 of 2014 in OS No.427 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajemahendravaram, East Godavari District and set aside the docket order dt. 08- 08-2017 passed in EA No.336 of 2017 in EP No.318 of 2014 by allowing the above CRP and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 6362 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings relating to the EP No.318/2014 in Os No.427/2013 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District pending disposal of the CRP Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M V S SARMA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4827/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to call for the records relating to the E.P.No.318 of 2014 in O.S.No.427 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajemahendravaram, East Godavari District and to set aside the docket order dated 08.08.2017 passed in E.A.No.336 of 2017 in E.P.No.318 of 2014. 2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives for further adjudication in the Revision Petition and the matter becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 22 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4827/2017 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS